-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/07 09:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On 11/07/07 09:03, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
>>> Is there such a thing as a temporary, probably in-memory, version of a
>>> Postgres DB?
>
>> If you have enough RAM, and your database is small enough, the OS
>> will eventually cache the whole thing.
>
> Or put it on a ramdisk filesystem.
But doesn't that just add more overhead and reduce the amount of
memory that the OS can cache things in?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHMeykS9HxQb37XmcRArErAJ47+9oq1/fTZZ4AXrLnL2qGo6E29gCgqVhP
DoZuWDTpWE4Rks3tjAWa0mQ=
=fuHr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
