On 30/11/2007, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pavel Stehule escribió: > > On 30/11/2007, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Pavel Stehule escribió: > > > > On 30/11/2007, Cultural Sublimation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > But still on that subject: is my version of get_items2 the simplest > > > > > that is possible in PL/pgSQL? It seems awfully verbose compared to > > > > > the SQL version... > > > > > > > > no. Your simplest version is historic relict and is available only in > > > > sql language. I am not sure, maybe in C language too. > > > > > > But isn't the case that on 8.3 you would be able to rewrite it more > > > easily using RETURN QUERY? > > > > yes. sure. But it is different question than call SRF function in > > normal context. > > Hmm, you are misunderstanding Cultural or I am. I think his verbosity > comment is not about the way the function is called, but rather about > the function body itself. >
It's my English. I am sorry. You have true. Thank you for correction Pavel > -- > Alvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile ICBM: S 39º 49' 18.1", W 73º 13' > 56.4" > "Before you were born your parents weren't as boring as they are now. They > got that way paying your bills, cleaning up your room and listening to you > tell them how idealistic you are." -- Charles J. Sykes' advice to teenagers > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
