On Nov 30, 2007 7:55 AM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Josh Harrison escribió:
>
> > Thanks...
> > I have 1 more question in the same line...
> >
> > *Query1*
> > SELECT person_id  FROM person   WHERE (column1=1 AND column2='62')
> > INTERSECT
> > SELECT person_id  FROM person  WHERE (column1=1 AND column2='189')
>
> Hmm, I think INTERSECT (and EXCEPT) is pretty stupid in Postgres in
> general.  Maybe INTERSECT ALL could be a bit faster, because it can
> avoid the sort steps.  Make sure you eliminate duplicates if they are a
> concern.


I get the same plan(see below)  with 'sort'  for 'intersect all' operation
too. Why is intersect not an effecient way? Is there any other way this
query/index can be written/created so that I can get the intersect results
in an efficient way?
Thanks
jo

QUERY
PLAN

 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 SetOp Intersect All  (cost=1750719.48..1769378.35 rows=373177 width=4)
(actual time=41065.459..45469.038 rows=128562
loops=1)
   ->  Sort  (cost=1750719.48..1760048.92 rows=3731774 width=4) (actual
time=41065.375..44027.342 rows=3756726
loops=1)
         Sort Key: "*SELECT*
1".patient_id

         Sort Method:  external merge  Disk:
73432kB

         ->  Append  (cost=17886.42..1209431.67 rows=3731774 width=4)
(actual time=1445.675..30171.066 rows=3756726
loops=1)
               ->  Subquery Scan "*SELECT* 1"
(cost=17886.42..496377.90rows=381993 width=4) (actual time=
1445.674..8223.061 rows=327498 loops=1)
                     ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on person   (cost=
17886.42..492557.97 rows=381993 width=4) (actual
time=1445.670..8021.006rows=327498 loops=1)
                           Recheck Cond: ((column1 = 1) AND ((column2)::text
= '62'::text))
                           ->  Bitmap Index Scan on person_idx  (cost=
0.00..17790.92 rows=381993 width=0) (actual
time=1440.189..1440.189rows=327498 loops=1)
                                 Index Cond: ((column1 = 1) AND
((column2)::text =
'62'::text))
               ->  Subquery Scan "*SELECT* 2"
(cost=156754.24..713053.77rows=3349781 width=4) (actual time=
4183.977..20195.276 rows=3429228 loops=1)
                     ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on person   (cost=
156754.24..679555.96 rows=3349781 width=4) (actual
time=4183.973..18191.919rows=3429228 loops=1)
                           Recheck Cond: ((column1 = 1) AND ((column2)::text
= '189'::text))
                           ->  Bitmap Index Scan on person_idx  (cost=
0.00..155916.80 rows=3349781 width=0) (actual
time=4178.644..4178.644rows=3429228 loops=1)
                                 Index Cond: ((column1 = 1) AND
((column2)::text =
'189'::text))
 Total runtime: 45504.425 ms

Reply via email to