Paul Caskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> No doubt about it, you're likely to get a few "duplicate key" errors and >> stuff like that. I'm just observing that it's not likely to be a >> complete catastrophe, especially not if you don't rely on OIDs to be >> unique in your user tables. > I don't rely on OID uniqueness, but I assumed Postgres does! Only in the system tables, and not even in all of them. From the system's point of view, there's no real need to assign OIDs to user table rows at all --- so another possible answer is not to do that, unless the user requests it. regards, tom lane
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Paul Caskey
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Paul Caskey
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Bradley Kieser
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Paul Caskey
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record lim... Paul Caskey
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? brad
- RE: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Andrew Snow
- RE: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Bradley Kieser
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Prasanth A. Kumar
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Bradley Kieser
- RE: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Andrew Snow
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Chris Bitmead