On Jan 4, 2008, at 9:35 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
It would be appropriate to convert NaN to NULL since the valid is
literally unknown.
It's not unknown: it's known to be something other than a number,
which is not the same as unknown.
*considers quoting Rumsfield, but common sense prevails*
Michael Glaesemann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
