Philip Hallstrom wrote:
> Oh... Duh!!! Geesh... for some reason I figured it would call the
> "built-in" UPPER, but obviously it won't. ha ha ha. *sigh*
> My next question then is how to get around this? I could just rename my
> function but it's nice to leave it UPPER since that is what it does. Is
> there another function that will uppercase? Or is there some way to
> call the other UPPER function? Or something within plpgsql I don't know
Uh, maybe I'm missing something, but, just _why_ do you need a pl/pgsql
function named UPPER that does nothing but call the built-in upper()?
Is there a type mismatch problem I'm not seeing? Why do you need to do
this?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
