On 11/04/2008 09:58, J Ottery wrote:
Thanks Craig for making me look like an idiot. I feel bad now.

When I posted I suspected that what you have just replied with was the
case.

I'm sure that wasn't Craig's intent. I'd hazard a guess that you've been using Access or a similar single-file-based DB where the you simply point the front-end at the data file, and the front-end looks after locking and concurrency (I think - I may be way off on this). PostgreSQL and other "heavyweight" DBMSs require a different mind-set - think of the server as a black box at which you fire off your SQL and get back the results.

HTH,

Ray.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Galway Cathedral Recitals: http://www.galwaycathedral.org/recitals
------------------------------------------------------------------

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to