Presumably, even if CLUSTER does reindexing internally, it only does that for the index used for clustering. Since REINDEX includes all indices, CLUSTER cannot truly replace REINDEX. Correct?
Jimmy On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Craig Ringer escribió: > > > > It's not stated explicitly, but I'm pretty sure discussion here has > > mentioned that too. Given that, VACUUM FULL on a just-CLUSTERed table > > should be redundant. > > It is, and a REINDEX is redundant too because CLUSTER does it > internally. > > -- > Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support > -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
