Dushyanth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Tom Lane <tgl <at> sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Then the only other possibility is that autovacuum is being launched to
>> prevent XID wraparound. Are there any tables in that database with
>> particularly old relfrozenxid?
> Below are the unique age(relfrozenxid) values that i see from the above query
> 140835139
> 150945753
> 185741480
Hmph. Does pg_database.datfrozenxid agree with that?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general