In response to Jef Peeraer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Bill Moran wrote: > > > In response to Jef Peeraer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > i read about the replication possibilities with postgresql. If i just > > > need > > > some replication ( without failover stuff ) to 1 standby server, what > > > would be the best option to go with. > > > > Your description of you requirements is very lacking, so much so that > > any attempt at suggesting a "best" option would be pointless. > > > > Provide some more information on your requirements and people will be > > able to answer intelligently. > my apology, i tried to be brief. > i've got a main database, where all transactions end up. Daily we make a > backup (pg_dumpall) and restore the first database in a sort of backup > database. This backup database is mainly used to do reporting. > To automate this process for the backup database and to minimize the > out-of-sync state, i should like to use replication. > The second backup database is only used as read-only, > except for some third party software that writes to 1 table.
You'd probably be best with Slony, just don't replicate that 1 table that you'll need to write to. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 412-422-3463x4023 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
