-----Original Message-----
From: Tomasz Ostrowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 21 August 2008 18:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: General
Subject: Re: Single character bitfields
On 2008-08-21 05:29, Andrew Maclean wrote:
> Is char(1) one byte in size?
No. It will also depend on database encoding, etc.
I think you should go with smallint, which is exactly 2 bytes. You'll
have 15 bits of storage (16 if you'd want to implement the special case
of minus sign).
IMHO the only smaller field are:
- one byte boolean, but it can only store 1 bit.
- one byte "char" (with quotes), but it is a non standard, integral
type, will cause interface problems and I don't know if it will not be
deprecated some time.
Regards
Tometzky
--
...although Eating Honey was a very good thing to do, there was a
moment just before you began to eat it which was better than when you
were...
Winnie the Pooh
Thankyou for this, after reading around I have also come to the same
conclusion that smallint is the better option.
Andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
