"Gauthier, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm in the business of writting recursive PL-Pgsql functions. I need to
> know what happens to the data stream from a select cursor inside of
> which the recursive call is made. For example....
Nothing, unless you use explicitly-named cursors and force a cursor name
conflict. A for-loop's internal cursor always gets a name chosen to be
distinct from every other existing cursor, so there's no conflict.
> This comes up witht he right answer. IOW, making the recursive call
> from within the "for rec in..." loop doesn't seem to destroy the data
> streams from earlier calls. I just need to make sure that this will
> always be the case and that getting the correct result in this example
> is not just an artifact of it's simplicity. I know, for example, this
> was a no-no in Oracle.
Wow, are they really that broken?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
