Hi, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> c) Postgres-R for multi-master data replication, appears to be a code >> fork of PostgreSQL > > Not stable as far as I know.
Correct, it's not meant to be stable at this stage of development. I'm a bit disturbed by the tag "code fork", which has a rather negative connotation. At the same time you compare with MySQL, featuring built-in replication. Let me simply point out and clarify, that I have absolutely no intent to fork from Postgres. Quite the opposite, I'm interested in working together with other Postgres hackers. See also FAQ 2.2: http://www.postgres-r.org/about/faqs Regards Markus Wanner -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
