Glen Parker <glene...@nwlink.com> writes:
> For some reason I got into my head the notion that a sequence could be
> dropped even if reference by a field default. This seems pretty silly now.
It was true once upon a time, but we have an enforcement mechanism now
to catch that. Did you find the default you needed to get rid of?
That 2604 row should be it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
