Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> If there's a camp that actually *wants* a NULL result for this case,
>> I missed the reasoning.
> So that we don't break existing apps because of an issue that is
> trivial to work around.
We would only be breaking them if a NULL result were actually the
correct behavior for the application's requirements, which seems
a bit unlikely.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
