On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Dennis Gearon<gear...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> I once talked to a company that made a custome version of Postgres. It split 
> tables up on columns and also by rows, had some other custome features. It 
> was enormously faster from what I gathered.

Faster at some things :-).  column oriented db is a tradeoff...it's
less work to get one or two columns but your record is not guaranteed
to be in one place on disk...which has obvious downsides.  I don't
have any evidence other than my gut, but I betcha column db being an
'evolutionary step' above current methods is mostly hype.  However for
certain workloads I'm sure it's great...

merlin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to