Alvaro Herrera-7 wrote:
>
> tomrevam wrote:
>
> This is why Tom was suggesting you to increase wal_buffers. Did
> you try that?
>
>
Increasing the wal_buffers improved the performance. Is there a limit on how
big I can raise them? Is there anything that would work worse with bigger
wal_buffers?
Thanks,
Tomer
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/synchronous_commit%3Doff-doesn%27t-always-return-immediately-tp24621119p24712612.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
