Alban Hertroys <[email protected]> writes:
> You seem to know what you're doing, but just in case we missed something as
> this is strange enough to have even the devs scratching their heads. The rows
> are there, so it _has_ to be an index or a transaction visibility issue...
The successful fetch-by-ctid test seems to have eliminated the
transaction-visibility-problem theory too. The whole thing is
passing strange at this point.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
