2010/2/2 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <dev...@gunduz.org> > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 13:09 +0000, Thom Brown wrote: > > > > Could someone clarify, is this guy indeed correct and the licence page > > needs updating stating it's something similar to an MIT licence, or is > > he just plain wrong? As it stands, the Wikipedia page on PostgreSQL > > says "similar to the MIT License". > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1256509037.7432.10.ca...@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org > > > I take it you're staying the licence page needs updating? Maybe some licence clarification should coincide with v9?
Thom
