Pete Kay <[email protected]> writes:
> I am setting up a connection pooling obj to pool a bunch of
> PGConnection object. That is why I am not closing the PGConn object
> when the query is done.
> Is that the right way to do it?
Well, that's fine, but you should not be complaining about some memory
associated with the PGconn not being reclaimed yet in that state.
I guess the context we are missing is why is it you are worried about
valgrind reporting a memory leak of a kilobyte or so?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
