On 27 April 2010 21:30, Chris Barnes <compuguruchrisbar...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> > I have just initialized a database with no errors, used the postgresql.conf > file from another system running 8.4.2. > Attempted to start and got the fatal error below. > I than ran pgtune and got the same error. > > I am not sure what the problem is? Is there more detailed logging than > below, or can be turned on? > > CentOS release 5.4 (Final) (installed and working) > CentOS release 5.2 (Final) (failing) > > > after pgtune > olap.rownum_name = 'default' > maintenance_work_mem = 1GB # pg_generate_conf wizard 2010-04-27 > effective_cache_size = 22GB # pg_generate_conf wizard 2010-04-27 > work_mem = 96MB # pg_generate_conf wizard 2010-04-27 > shared_buffers = 7680MB # pg_generate_conf wizard 2010-04-27 > ~ > ~ > > > > [r...@rc-rec-five pgtune-0.9.0]# /etc/init.d/postgresql stop > Stopping postgresql service: [FAILED] > [r...@rc-rec-five pgtune-0.9.0]# /etc/init.d/postgresql start > Starting postgresql service: [FAILED] > [r...@rc-rec-five pgtune-0.9.0]# cat pgstartup.log > cat: pgstartup.log: No such file or directory > [r...@rc-rec-five pgtune-0.9.0]# cat /data/pgsql/data/pgstartup.log > 2010-04-27 16:19:17 EDT FATAL: requested shared memory size overflows > size_t > 2010-04-27 16:22:27 EDT FATAL: requested shared memory size overflows > size_t > > /var/log/messages/ > Apr 27 13:57:56 rc-rec5 ntpd[2990]: synchronized to 206.248.171.198, > stratum 1 > Apr 27 16:13:45 rc-rec5 postgres[5717]: [1-1] 2010-04-27 16:13:45 EDT > FATAL: requested shared memory size overflows size_t > Apr 27 16:19:17 rc-rec5 postgres[7736]: [1-1] 2010-04-27 16:19:17 EDT > FATAL: requested shared memory size overflows size_t > Apr 27 16:22:27 rc-rec5 postgres[9648]: [1-1] 2010-04-27 16:22:27 EDT > FATAL: requested shared memory size overflows size_t > > > This might sound like a strange question, but are the architectures of the servers different? Specifically, is the failing server 32-bit and the working server 64-bit? And what architecture is PostgreSQL built against on the failing server? Thom