On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Mike Christensen <m...@kitchenpc.com> wrote: > What's the best way to do this? Looks like something like pgPool > might be what I want, but I haven't looked into it deeply yet.
I don't think your requirement and postgres are consistent with each other. Unless your data volume is *so* tiny that copying it takes just a few seconds, this concept just won't work. Besides the fact that I don't think there is a master-master solution that does not impose a lot of overhead and will deal gracefully with nodes disappearing and appearing arbitrarily. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
