On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_ea...@gmx.net> wrote: > Richard Broersma wrote on 12.05.2010 17:45: > >> I'm considering using the windows version PostgreSQL in the following >> conditions: >> at least 10 years of up time (with periodic power failures<= 1 a year) > > I don't think you can get 10 years of up time on a Windows Server. > > Most of the security patches will need a reboot, and that means probably one > reboot every month.
:) Hopefully this isn't the real reason for the catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico. Actually my observation with several clients in the industry that I work, I've noticed that systems like this never get patches applied. If the system breaks or is known to be unreliable, then the whole system is replaced. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
