Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> * S G (sgennar...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> I guess to really get down to the issue, I'm curious if what I'm doing is
>> considered 'standard procedure' to others-- i.e. using funny workarounds
>> like building the query in a text var and executing it with plpgsql's RETURN
>> QUERY EXECUTE command.
> It's certainly not unusual when it's necessary. We do try to minimize
> the times it's necessary by making the planner as smart as possible.
Yeah. This is a known sore spot that I hope to do something about in
the 9.1 development cycle.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
