On Sep 27, 2010, at 23:20 , Tim Uckun wrote: >> Why are you messing with ctid? Does the table have no key? If not, you >> should fix that first. >> > > I got the idea from here > > http://www.postgres.cz/index.php/PostgreSQL_SQL_Tricks
If your table already has a key (some column or combination of columns that is unique per row), there's really no need to use ctid. The only reason they're using ctid on that page because they have duplicate rows: the table *doesn't* have a key and they have no other way to specify rows uniquely. Given you reference an id column, I suspect your your table already has a key, so you should just use that. ctid is an implementation detail of PostgreSQL rather than part of the logical design of the database: it really shouldn't be used unless you absolutely have to. Anyway, sounds like you got it sussed out. Good luck with straightening out the rest of your data! Michael Glaesemann grzm seespotcode net -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
