On 02/20/2011 09:38 AM, deepak wrote:
build.pl <http://build.pl> parses the Makefile to determine the list
of sources, etc. Essentially, your extension is built using the unix
Makefile. Since you've already built Pg its self from sources you
will have used build.pl <http://build.pl> to do it (right?) and
it'll be easy for you to add the contrib module and re-run.
The downside of this approach is that build.pl <http://build.pl>
isn't a complete Makefile parser, and is easily confused by anything
but the most trivial Makefile syntax. I had problems when I was
putting the crashdump module together because build.pl
<http://build.pl> didn't understand ifndef .
--
Craig Ringer
Ok, I hadn't realized that the VS build system extrapolates information
from unix Makefiles..
I briefly tried adding a new contrib module for my extension and
re-running the VS build (src\tools\msvc\build.bat), and still get the
same error.
(about redefinition of errcode). Somehow, it seems to me that there's
an inherent incompatibility..
OK, so you're building it within the main Pg build system. Pg was
successfully compiled, including files that use elog.h . Yet your
extension doesn't compile, complaining about a macro/typedef conflict.
This makes me wonder: what's different?
Can you post the full sources of your extension, including the Makefile?
--
Craig Ringer
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
