how about 4.3.2? I have gcc 4.3.2 compiled postgresql 9.0.4 as slave, is that okay that I turn the slave into master? so the switch will be a lot more smooth.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Yan Chunlu <springri...@gmail.com> writes: >> oh god...thanks a lot for the tip. I did actually lost some data, the >> master server has crashed two times. every time it comes back, the >> index were broken. I need to reindex it. I have already set fsync=on. >> just thought it was normal behavior.... > > Uh, no. > >> about gcc version, only 4.6.0 effected? 4.6.1 is okay? then I could >> compile my own version with 4.6.1 > > It's supposed to be fixed in 4.6.1 according to > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49390 > > Personally I'd use 4.6.1 *and* apply the Postgres patch. > > regards, tom lane > -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
