On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 7:22:25 am hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > hi, > Question is basically in the title, but let's show some example: > > $ begin; > BEGIN > > *$ set timezone = 'EST'; > SET > > *$ select now(), extract(epoch from now()), extract(epoch from now() at > time zone 'UTC'); now │ date_part │ date_part > ───────────────────────────────┼──────────────────┼────────────────── > 2012-01-25 10:19:17.366139-05 │ 1327504757.36614 │ 1327522757.36614 > (1 row) > > *$ set timezone = 'CET'; > SET > > *$ select now(), extract(epoch from now()), extract(epoch from now() at > time zone 'UTC'); now │ date_part │ date_part > ───────────────────────────────┼──────────────────┼────────────────── > 2012-01-25 16:19:17.366139+01 │ 1327504757.36614 │ 1327501157.36614 > (1 row) > > Why aren't the 3rd date_parts the same in both cases? I mean - I see that > they are adjusted due to timezone, but why is it happening? > > Based on \dt+, I seem to see that it should be immutable: > *$ \df+ date_part
Its not the extract part but the at time zone part see: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/functions-datetime.html#FUNCTIONS-DATETIME-ZONECONVERT -- Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@gmail.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
