Thom Brown <[email protected]> writes:
> What am I missing?
I might be more confused than you, but I think you're supposing that
the result of ascii(E'\\1') has something to do with the match that
the surrounding regexp_replace function will find, later on when it
gets executed. The actual arguments seen by regexp_replace are
regression=# select E'Hello & goodbye ',E'([&])','&#' ||
ascii(E'\\1') || E';\\1';
?column? | ?column? | ?column?
------------------+----------+----------
Hello & goodbye | ([&]) | \\1
(1 row)
and given that, the result looks perfectly fine to me.
If there's a bug here, it's that ascii() ignores additional bytes in its
input instead of throwing an error for a string with more than one
character. But I believe we've discussed that in the past and decided
not to change it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general