Re: [GENERAL] pg_log

[Tom Lane]

"Oliver Elphick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Developers:
> I've seen this question several times; wouldn't it be better to rename
> pg_log to pg_tuplestatus?  Calling something ...log is asking for it
> to be wiped.

In 7.1 it'll have a numeric filename ($PGDATA/global/1269, actually)
which should reduce the tendency for DBAs to assume there's nothing
important in it.  I regard this as one of the major advantages of 
having switched to numeric filenames ;-)

                        regards, tom lane