On Tue, February 28, 2012 14:17, Adrian Klaver wrote: > No, you just did not run into the issue, probably > because your template1 was just a straight clone of > template0 with no added features >
You are correct. It was the inability to change the comment on the extension as required by the pg_dump file because of the ownership of the extension which triggered this entire discussion. I have removed plpgsql from template1 on all the systems affected. The tests now run against 9.1 fine. Regards, -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
