Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.rom...@notorand.it> writes: > Why not using the implicit pg_temp_nnn as seen in views and tables?
That's intentional, it was considered too much of a security risk to
let temporary functions mask normal ones.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
