Alberto Zanon <[email protected]> writes: > I agree with you about the concept of "port number". I only wanted to know if > it is a new behavior of Postgresql 9.1.
More like 9.0, according to our commit logs: Author: Tom Lane <[email protected]> Branch: master Release: REL9_0_BR [61be11ff0] 2009-09-27 03:43:10 +0000 Make libpq reject non-numeric and out-of-range port numbers with a suitable error message, rather than blundering on and failing with something opaque. Sam Mason regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
