On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Lonni J Friedman <netll...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Thanks for your reply.  This sounds like a relatively simple
>> workaround, so I'll give it a try.  Is the search_path of the remote
>> session that postgres_fdw forces considered to be intentional,
>> expected behavior, or is it a bug?
>
> It's intentional.
>
> Possibly more to the point, don't you think your trigger function is
> rather fragile if it assumes the caller has provided a particular
> search path setting?

To be honest, I don't have much experience with functions, and was
using the trigger function from the official documentation:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/ddl-partitioning.html


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to