On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Andy Colson <a...@squeakycode.net> wrote:

> Here's an odd question.  Kind of an in the future thing.
>
> I have two db's on two smaller boxes I'd like to combine to one big box.
>  But one db is replicated and the other doesn't need it.
>
> I know currently you must replicate the entire cluster.  I was just
> wondering, would it be a possible way forward to support WAL logging per
> tablespace.  (each tablespace wal's to different directory).  Then, as a
> logical step, could we support replication per tablespace?
>
> Just kinda thinking out loud.
>
> -Andy
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

This is more popularly called logical replication. There was a talk about
one of the bigger projects to get this incorporated into core at last
year's PGCon. It's quite a complex feature to get implemented, so it's
probably not going to be around for a while yet. Links to the talk and
slides are on the conference website if you're curious to learn more
http://www.pgcon.org/2013/schedule/events/577.en.html

In the mean time, there are several third-party solutions that can provide
logical replication, the more popular being Slony & Bucardo. I've been
working on one myself as well (Mimeo) that's not quite as advanced as those
two, but a little simpler to configure if you just need a few tables
replicated.

http://bucardo.org/wiki/Bucardo
http://slony.info/
https://github.com/omniti-labs/mimeo

Hope that helps to answer your questions


--
Keith Fiske
Database Administrator
OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc.
http://www.keithf4.com

Reply via email to