Sergey Konoplev escribió: > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > People periodically ask for extensions flavored more or less like this, > > but I'm suspicious of building any such thing into the core. There's too > > little commonality in the exact conditions they want to search on. > > Leaving it at the level of a scripting problem, as above, allows arbitrary > > customization of the search condition. > > I understand the POV of both Evan and you here. However, I think that > there might be a good solution for this particular case - to allow > dropping functions by name only if it has the only signature, but if > there are 2 or more signatures then print an error specifying all the > forms of the function, eg.: > > ERROR: Can not drop function 'foo' because it has more then one > signature: foo(integer), foo(text).
But that doesn't solve Evan's request. He would want both functions gone, not an error. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
