Hi Brian!
I got a patch to fix this. Unfortunately, I'm having some problems with
github at this moment and I couldn't push it to create a pull request.
Would you mind to patch a local copy of Npgsql code and give it a try?
Here is the patch:
diff --git a/Npgsql/Npgsql/NpgsqlConnector.cs
b/Npgsql/Npgsql/NpgsqlConnector.cs
index eb7da15..5e090be 100644
--- a/Npgsql/Npgsql/NpgsqlConnector.cs
+++ b/Npgsql/Npgsql/NpgsqlConnector.cs
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ internal void ReleaseResources()
internal void ReleaseWithDiscard()
{
- NpgsqlCommand.ExecuteBlind(this, NpgsqlQuery.DiscardAll, 60);
+ NpgsqlCommand.ExecuteBlind(this, NpgsqlQuery.DiscardAll);
// The initial connection parameters will be restored via
IsValid()
}
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ internal void Open()
initQueries = sbInitQueries.ToString();
- NpgsqlCommand.ExecuteBlind(this, initQueries, 60);
+ NpgsqlCommand.ExecuteBlind(this, initQueries);
// Make a shallow copy of the type mapping that the connector
will
// It is possible that the connector may add types to its
privateY
Thanks in advance and sorry for this problem.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Brian Crowell <br...@fluggo.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ... Or maybe it is mangling the "ROLLBACK;" into some form
> > the database doesn't recognize. Look in the postgres log files to see
> what
> > the events look like from PostgreSQL's perspective.
>
> Well that's the clue I needed. I was misinterpreting Postgres's log
> file; it was complaining about the "SET statement_timeout" statement
> Npgsql was slipping ahead of my ROLLBACK. Apparently I need to do
> transactions with Npgsql's transaction class.
>
> --Brian
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
--
Regards,
Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
Npgsql Lead Developer
http://www.npgsql.org
http://gplus.to/franciscojunior
http://fxjr.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/franciscojunior
