Joseph Shraibman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Then it should do the same thing no matter what value I use, but when I > do different searches in one case it estimates 50 when there are 16 and > in the other it estimeates 502 where there are 502. Well, it does know the difference between searching for the most common value and searching for other values, but whether that's relevant to your example is impossible to say with no details. regards, tom lane
- Re: [GENERAL] Weird indices Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [GENERAL] Weird indices Joseph Shraibman
- Re: [GENERAL] Weird indices Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [GENERAL] Weird indices Joseph Shraibman
- Re: [GENERAL] Weird indices Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] Weird indices Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [GENERAL] Weird indices Joseph Shraibman
- Re: [GENERAL] Weird indic... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] Weird indices Joseph Shraibman
- Re: [GENERAL] Weird indices Stephan Szabo
- Re: [GENERAL] Weird indices Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] Weird indices Martijn van Oosterhout
- Re: [GENERAL] Weird indices Stephan Szabo
- Re: [GENERAL] Weird indices Richard Huxton