We've been running 9.2 on our later branches for a while now. We're overdue to bump the older branches to a later 8.4 though, you're right. Thanks for the reminder.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Nick Cabatoff <nick.cabat...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > 8.4.9. > This has been released in 2011, so you are missing 3 years worth of > bug fixes. It may be a good idea to first update to 8.4.21 before > trying to work more on that (consider as well an upgrade as 8.4 will > be EOL soon). > > Regards, > -- > Michael >
