Chris Hanks <christopher.m.ha...@gmail.com> writes:
> CREATE VIEW tables AS
> SELECT a.*, b.col AS other_col
> FROM a
> LEFT JOIN b ON a.id = b.id
> UNION ALL
> SELECT c.*, d.col AS other_col
> FROM c
> LEFT JOIN d ON c.id = d.id;
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE
> SELECT *
> FROM tables
> WHERE id = 89; -- Index scans, as expected.
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE
> SELECT *
> FROM e
> JOIN tables ON e.col = tables.id
> WHERE e.id = 568; -- Big merge joins, when simple index scans should
> be possible?
> Would this be considered a deficiency in the optimizer? Is there a simple fix?
Don't hold your breath. To arrive at the
union-on-the-inside-of-a-nestloop plan you're hoping for, the planner
would have to create a "parameterized path" for the UNION ALL structure.
But when you have joins in the arms of the UNION ALL, they are considered
to be independent subqueries, and we currently have a policy decision not
to try to generate parameterized paths for subqueries. It'd be quite
expensive and I think the planner is probably lacking some necessary
mechanisms anyway.
Given that e.id is unique, you could possibly fake it with something like
select * from tables where id = (select e.col from e where e.id = 568);
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
