On 15 September 2014 20:13, cowwoc <cow...@bbs.darktech.org> wrote: On 15/09/2014 2:12 PM, cowwoc wrote: > > On 15/09/2014 2:02 PM, lup [via PostgreSQL] wrote: > > On 09/15/2014 11:49 AM, cowwoc wrote: > > I think developers choosing this route (myself included) are willing to > pay the price in exchange for improved readability/maintainability (the > assumption being that the resulting performance will be "good enough"). > There seem to be plenty of people heading in this direction otherwise other > languages (like pl/v8) wouldn't enjoy the popularity they do. > > Gili > > I've seen too many good java developers write too much terrible > database-oriented code. If they are good with db and sql, plpgsql will not > be a problem to learn. > > > lup, > > Then does Postgresql support languages other than pl/pgsql? I'm not trying > to tear down pl/pgsql, simply pointing out that there is strong demand for > other languages as well. > > And to answer Pavel's earlier point: the lack of developers getting behind > pl/java and JDBC driver does not equate the lack of demand for those tools. > For every one person contributing patches, there are 1000s who do not but > are more than happy to use the finished work. > > Gili > > > "Then does" was meant to read "Then *why* does" :) > > Gili >
Hi, you're right. But there is no other way to have this done than have someone done it. If there are no people interested in doing that it will not be done. Unfortunately. - Szymon
