On 09/21/2014 06:50 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
På søndag 21. september 2014 kl. 15:48:00, skrev Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>>:On 09/21/2014 05:44 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: > På søndag 21. september 2014 kl. 13:51:00, skrev Bill Moran > <wmo...@potentialtech.com <mailto:wmo...@potentialtech.com>>: > > > I see this limitation in Slyny: > http://slony.info/documentation/2.2/limitations.html > > Slony-I does not automatically replicate > > * > > Changes to large objects (BLOBS) > > * > > Changes made by DDL commands > > * > > Changes to users and roles > > Not being able to replicate BLOBS is a show-stopper for me as we have > lots of them. Well I would say it depends on where you are storing the binary data, in large objects or in a bytea column? If you are using bytea columns then you would be okay. If it is large objects then you have a problem. Large-objects, not BYTEA, as they allow for much more efficient streaming (require less memory).
Here are some other suggestions from the project, though they are cluster wide(including PITR):
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/backup-file.html
-- *Andreas Joseph Krogh* CTO / Partner - Visena AS Mobile: +47 909 56 963 andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com> www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com> <https://www.visena.com>
-- Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
