Frank Joerdens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't see why it shouldn't work, since 7.1 supports an unlimited row
> width. The question is: Why would you want to do that? A filesystem is
> always faster than a database, which is usually a very important
> consideration with a mailserver (or were you thinking about archiving
> messages?).
I'm interested in the archiving aspect, e.g. having pgsql as the storage
for an imap server.
regards,
Gunnar
- [GENERAL] Can PostgreSQL be a mail backend? Morten W. Petersen
- Re: [GENERAL] Can PostgreSQL be a mail backend? John Madden
- Re: [GENERAL] Can PostgreSQL be a mail backend... Gordan Bobic
- Re: [GENERAL] Can PostgreSQL be a mail backend? Frank Joerdens
- [GENERAL] Re: Can PostgreSQL be a mail backend... Gunnar R|nning
- [GENERAL] Re: Can PostgreSQL be a mail backend? Gunnar R|nning
- Re: [GENERAL] Can PostgreSQL be a mail backend? Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Can PostgreSQL be a mail backend? Tod McQuillin
