On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 01:10:27PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On 14.05.2015 19:35, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 02:26:08PM +0200, Leif Jensen wrote: > >> Hi guys. > >> > >> In the ECPG manual (including latest 9.1.9) about ECPG SQL SET > >> CONNECTION <connection name>; it is stated that "This is not thread-aware". > >> > >> When looking in the ecpg library code connect.c for ECPGsetconn( ... ), > >> it looks very much like it is thread-aware if translated with the > >> --enable-thread-safety option. > >> > >> What should I believe ? > > > > Can someone comment on this report from 2013? > > Sorry, it seems I missed this email. Yes, the code should be > thread-aware, at least I don't know of any problems with it. It appears > to me that the docs haven't been updated by the patch that made ecpg > work with threads back in the day.
Thanks. Is that the only doc line that needs adjustment? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
