On 19/06/2015 03:31, Sameer Kumar wrote:

On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:17 Xavier 12 <mania...@gmail.com <mailto:mania...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On 18/06/2015 04:00, Sameer Kumar wrote:



        On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:24 Xavier 12 <mania...@gmail.com
        <mailto:mania...@gmail.com>> wrote:


            On 17/06/2015 03:17, Sameer Kumar wrote:


                On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 16:55 Xavier 12
                <mania...@gmail.com <mailto:mania...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                    Hi everyone,

                    Questions about pg_xlogs again...
                    I have two Postgresql 9.1 servers in a
                    master/slave stream replication
                    (hot_standby).

                    Psql01 (master) is backuped with Barman and
                    pg_xlogs is correctly
                    purged (archive_command is used).

                    Hower, Psql02 (slave) has a huge pg_xlog (951
                    files, 15G for 7 days
                    only, it keeps growing up until disk space is
                    full). I have found
                    documentation and tutorials, mailing list, but I
                    don't know what is
                    suitable for a Slave. Leads I've found :

                    - checkpoints
                    - archive_command
                    - archive_cleanup

                    Master postgresq.conf :

                    [...]
                    wal_level = 'hot_standby'
                    archive_mode = on
                    archive_command = 'rsync -az
                    /var/lib/postgresql/9.1/main/pg_xlog/%f
                    bar...@nas.lan:/data/pgbarman/psql01/incoming/%f
                    <mailto:bar...@nas.lan:/data/pgbarman/psql01/incoming/%25f>'
                    max_wal_senders = 5
                    wal_keep_segments = 64

                What's this parameter's value on Slave?

            Hm... You have a point.
            That autovacuum parameter seems to be useless on a slave.
            I'll try to remove it and check pg_xlog.



        That was not my point. I was actually asking about
        wal_keep_segment. Nevermind I found that I had misses the info
        (found it below. Please see my response).
        Besides I try to keep my master and standby config as same as
        possible(so my advise ia to not switchoff autovacuum). The
        parameters which are imeffective on slave anyways won't have
        an effect. Same goes for parameters on master.
        This helps me when I swap roles or do a failover. I have less
        parameters to be worried about.


    Okay


        Can you check the pg_log for log files. They may have se info?
        I am sorry if you have already provided that info (after I
        finish I will try to look at your previous emails on this thread)


    Nothing...
    /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-2015-06-17_111131.log is empty
    (except old messages at the begining related to a configuration
    issue - which is now solved - after rebuilding the cluster yesterday).
    /var/log/syslog has nothing but these :

    Jun 18 09:10:11 Bdd02 postgres[28400]: [2-1] 2015-06-18 09:10:11
    CEST LOG:  paquet de d?marrage incomplet
    Jun 18 09:10:41 Bdd02 postgres[28523]: [2-1] 2015-06-18 09:10:41
    CEST LOG:  paquet de d?marrage incomplet
    Jun 18 09:11:11 Bdd02 postgres[28557]: [2-1] 2015-06-18 09:11:11
    CEST LOG:  paquet de d?marrage incomplet
    Jun 18 09:11:41 Bdd02 postgres[28652]: [2-1] 2015-06-18 09:11:41
    CEST LOG:  paquet de d?marrage incomplet
    Jun 18 09:12:11 Bdd02 postgres[28752]: [2-1] 2015-06-18 09:12:11
    CEST LOG:  paquet de d?marrage incomplet
    Jun 18 09:12:41 Bdd02 postgres[28862]: [2-1] 2015-06-18 09:12:41
    CEST LOG:  paquet de d?marrage incomplet
    Jun 18 09:13:11 Bdd02 postgres[28891]: [2-1] 2015-06-18 09:13:11
    CEST LOG:  paquet de d?marrage incomplet
    Jun 18 09:13:40 Bdd02 postgres[28987]: [2-1] 2015-06-18 09:13:40
    CEST LOG:  paquet de d?marrage incomplet

    These messages are related to Zabbix (psql port check).


You sure these are the only messages you have in the log files?


        Also can you share the vacuum cost parameters in your environm

en

        t?



    I don't understand that part... is this in postgresql.conf ?

There are vacuum cost parameters in postgresql.conf

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/runtime-config-resource.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-RESOURCE-VACUUM-COST



                    autovacuum = on

                    Slave postgresql.conf :

                    [...]
                    wal_level = minimal
                    wal_keep_segments = 32



        Sorry I missed this somehow earlier. Any reason why you think
        you need to retain 32 wal files on slave?


    No but I get the feeling that the parameter is ignored by my
    slave... should I try another value ?




AFAIK you don't nees this parameter to set to > 0 unless you have cascaded replica pull wal from stand by or you have backup jobs running to backup from standby. Set it to 0 on the standby and check.



                    hot_standby = on

                    Slave recovery.conf :

                    standby_mode = 'on'
                    primary_conninfo = 'host=10.0.0.1 port=5400
                    user=postgres'
                    trigger_file = '/var/lib/postgresql/9.1/triggersql'
                    restore_command='cp
                    /var/lib/postgresql/9.1/wal_archive/%f "%p"'
                    archive_cleanup_command =
                    '/usr/lib/postgresql/9.1/bin/pg_archivecleanup
                    /var/lib/postgresql/9.1/wal_archive/ %r'



        Also consider setting hot_standby_feesback to on.


    I will check that parameter in the documentation,

    Thanks


                    How can I reduce the number of WAL files on the
                    hot_stanby slave ?




Hello
What happens if archive_command is stuck ? This happens in my Primary server because the remote SSH has timeouts sometimes. So I can see rsync process during a long time in the primary.
Maybe this is the reason why WAL rotation is bad on the server.

Regards,
Xavier C.

Reply via email to