On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:54:31PM -0700, Ken Tanzer wrote: > Thanks, but I guess I should have been clearer. Thanks to y'all wonderful > mailing list folks, I get it now as to why the two sorts are not the same. > I'm hoping for practical suggestions or advice about how to get C locale > sorting without having to rewrite all my existing queries.
Why not change the collation for the column? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/interactive/sql-altertable.html > be clinging to futile hope, but is there really no way to specify a > collation for the return value of a function? I don't believe so. I think you need to specify the collation for the data itself. It strikes me that you might be able to similate this with a materialized view or something like that, which has a different collation than the source table. That seems like it'd be pretty awkward, but if there's some reason you can't use C collation on the source table itself that might work. I guess you could do the same thing with a temporary table inside the function, thereby getting a different collation on the data than in the source table. These both seem like hacks, but if you need a bugfix prior to a real solution they'd give you a path. A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@crankycanuck.ca -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
