On 09/17/2015 06:32 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
pinker wrote:
I've tried to write audit trigger which fires only when data changed, so I used
"WHEN (OLD.* IS
DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)" clause as described in documentation
<http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/sql-createtrigger.html> . Should
this clause be independent
from data type? because an error occurs when I'm trying to modify row with
point data type: ERROR:
could not identify an equality operator for type point
I guess it is dependent on data type as it requires an equality operator,
and type "point" doesn't have one.
To echo the OP, why is that?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/interactive/functions-comparison.html
For non-null inputs, IS DISTINCT FROM is the same as the <> operator.
So:
test=> select '(1,2)'::point <> '(1,2)'::point;
?column?
----------
f
(1 row)
test=> select '(1,2)'::point <> '(1,3)'::point;
?column?
----------
t
test=> select '(1,2)'::point <> null;
?column?
----------
(1 row)
You'd have to hand-roll a comparison in this case, probably using the
"same as" operator "~=".
I could force it to work by casting:
test=> select '(1,2)'::point::text is distinct from '(1,2)'::point::text;
?column?
----------
f
(1 row)
test=> select '(1,2)'::point::text is distinct from '(1,3)'::point::text;
?column?
----------
t
(1 row)
test=> select '(1,2)'::point::text is distinct from null;
?column?
----------
t
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
