On 12/30/2015 9:55 AM, Andy Colson wrote:
On 12/30/2015 9:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andy Colson <a...@squeakycode.net> writes:
Here are my results, if there are any others you'd like to see please
let me know. Thanks Tom.
For comparison, could we see the results for the non-partial case, ie
explain analyze
select *
from search
where search_vec @@ to_tsquery('213 & E & 13 & ST & N');
regards, tom lane
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bitmap Heap Scan on search (cost=6.00..7.02 rows=1 width=100) (actual
time=0.029..0.029 rows=0 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: (search_vec @@ to_tsquery('213 & E & 13 & ST & N'::text))
-> Bitmap Index Scan on search_key (cost=0.00..6.00 rows=1
width=0) (actual time=0.025..0.025 rows=0 loops=1)
Index Cond: (search_vec @@ to_tsquery('213 & E & 13 & ST &
N'::text))
Total runtime: 0.060 ms
(5 rows)
Oh! I just realized... this is on my test box and I just blew away that
table to rebuild it. And I have to run off to a meeting, so if this
analyze makes no sense, that's why.
I'll re-re-do it within the hour. Sorry about that.
-Andy
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
