On 18/01/2016 19:36, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On 01/18/2016 10:15 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> >> wrote: >> >>> * Participants who disrupt the collaborative space, or participate in a >>> pattern of behaviour which could be considered harassment will not be >>> tolerated. >> >> Personally, I was comfortable with the rest of it, but this one >> made me squirm a little. Could we spin that to say that those >> behaviors will not be tolerated, versus not tolerating the people? >> Maybe: >> >> * Disruption of the collaborative space or any pattern of >> behaviour which could be considered harassment will not be >> tolerated. > > No argument from me. I think they both service the same gist. > > Sincerely, > > JD > > >
I would also vote in favour of not tolerating the behaviour. I guess it would be less open to critics than saying a participant is not tolerated... -- Stéphane Schildknecht Contact régional PostgreSQL pour l'Europe francophone Loxodata - Conseil, expertise et formations 06.17.11.37.42 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
