On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Geoff Winkless <pgsqlad...@geoff.dj> wrote:
> On 20 January 2016 at 20:04, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > "which could be considered" is too open-ended. Since this point is > > the one and only that can cause enforcement to occur, it should be more > > strict as to what it is that will not be tolerated. I'd propose > > something like "is widely regarded as harassment" or something like > > that, so that it needs to be clear that there is a large group of people > > that considers the behavior unwanted rather than some minority. > > The problem with _that_ is that on the internet of 3 billion people "a > large group of people" can be whipped up from a tiny minority. > At the end of the day this will require human judgment rather than formulation. Human judgment may be flawed but in a culturally diverse group it is far better than the alternative. > > Geoff > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > -- Best Wishes, Chris Travers Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. http://www.efficito.com/learn_more
